Therefore, the minimum standards of education, experience and competence etc. Section 11513 exempts “any individual who has received the “Certified Community Association Manager” (CCAM) designation.” This would imply that the CCAM designation is equivalent to the California State License and this simply is not the case. ” Section 11501 and section 11513, therefore, are conflicting. The purpose of this bill as stated in section 11501 is “to institute consistent minimum standards of education, experience, competence, fair and ethical behavior for individuals who are managers of common interest developments. On May 12, 2001, I wrote a letter to Commissioner Paula Reddish Zinnemann, Real Estate Commissioner and again “urgently requesting the California Department of Real Estate to extend their licensing requirements to include condominium association property managers.”Īn Assembly Bill is now before the Senate, we commend Assembly Member Dutra and Senator Correa for introducing Assembly Bill 555, Section 11513 of the bill, however, is of great concern and I strongly recommend it be removed. Real Estate Commissioner, I requested that the State of California Department of Real Estate extent the licensing requirements to include community association property managers. It is inconceivable that individuals who are managers of Common Interest Developments are presently permitted to work, without a license of any kind, in an industry that, by it’s very nature, requires extraordinary regulation, poses tremendous potential to many of the problems plaguing California and has become an integral part of California’s Real Estate industry and California’s economy. We commend Assembly Member Dutra and Senator Correa for introducing Assembly Bill 555 to the California State Legislature. Licensing HOA Property Managers Our Response to AB 555
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |